(PHOTO: Dr. Cécile Kyenge Kashetu, 49, new Italian minister for Integration)
***
Enrico Letta, the new Italian leftist prime minister, has just
appointed the first ever black cabinet minister in Italian history.
The new minister was until her appointment an MP of the leftist
Democratic Party (PD), Cécile Kyenge Kashetu, who has to manage the
contentious portfolio of Integration, a newfangled political-correct
ministry.
And she happens to be a Congolese-born eye surgeon who emigrated to
Italy in her late teens, and later on became a naturalized Italian
citizen.
Dr. Kyenge is married and the mother of two daughters--Maïsha and Giulia.
Dr. Kyenge was born in the now restive mining city of Kambove in
Katanga Province. Just this past February, violent clashes pitted the
Congolese police against artisanal miners who were being evacuated
from a makeshift mining site outside Kambove.
According to a contemporaneous report by Radio Okapi, those clashes on
February 19 obtained a deadly toll:
"[F]ive injured people including three wounded by live bullets, ten
arrests, and property belonging to Gecamines and the Congolese state
ransacked or burned."
Anyway, right now Kambove may be murky and blurry in the mind of
Integration Minister Kyenge, for she has a lot on her plate.
To be true, as the Guardian reported, the Ghanaian-Italian AC Milan
striker Mario Balotelli hailed Kyenge's appointment as "a further, big
step towards a more civilised and responsible Italian society."
But, still according to the Guardian, as her agenda aims at "changing
Italy's citizenship laws, which are based on descent rather than place
of birth," she quickly drew massive flak from the rightwing Northern
League.
Matteo Salvini, one of the leaders of the League, blasted Kyenge's
appointment as "the symbol of a hypocritical, do-gooding left that
would like to abolish the crime of illegal immigration and only thinks
about immigrants' rights and not their duties."
(Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/apr/28/italy-first-black-minister-attacked)
***
PHOTO CREDITS: Via dazebaonews.it
Monday, 29 April 2013
Friday, 12 April 2013
Earl W. Gast, USAID Deputy Administrator for Africa, talks governance with representatives of DRC civil society
(PHOTO: CLOCKWISE: Lea Ndombasi, youth organizer; Yangu Kiakwama,
opposition political activist; an unidentified civil society actor;
me; USAID/DRC Acting Mission Director Catherine Andang; USAID/DRC
Mission Director Diana Putman; USAID Deputy Administrator for Africa
Earl W. Gast; Chief of staff of USAID Africa Bureau Sean Maloney; and
Angèle Makombo-Eboum, opposition leader)
***
For his first visit to Kinshasa, Earl W. Gast, USAID Deputy
Administrator for Africa, found time in the early afternoon of
Wednesday, April 10, to talk with a select group of representatives of
civil society—as well as a high-profile politician—of the Democratic
Republic of Congo about a rare commodity in this country: governance.
Gast was flanked by his own chief of staff, Sean Maloney; USAID/DRC
Mission Director Diana Putman; Acting USAID/DRC Mission Director
Catherine Andang; USAID/DRC Democracy and Governance Officer Theodore
"Ted" Glenn; and two unidentified USAID/DRC staff members, who sat in
the background.
The high-profile Congolese politician I just alluded to was Ms. Angèle
N. Makombo-Eboum, chair of the tiny political party called "Ligue des
Congolais Démocrates" (LIDEC).
In my view, at a roundtable where "governance" is the theme, a good
governance of one's own narrative has to be the leitmotif too.
By introducing herself as one of the presidential candidates in the
November 2011 election when in fact she wasn't on the official roster
of the National Independent Electoral Commission (CENI), Makombo
failed miserably the test of what I'd call the "narrative's good
governance." At the end of the meeting, she gave me her business card
that read in parts: "Candidate at the presidential election of 2011 in
the DRC."
I don't understand why a leader of such national stature need to be
peddling such unnecessary untruths. No wonder then that Congolese
politicians have lost all political credit and are being looked down
with utter contempt by Residents of the Republic.
Well, two high-profile Americans in the room didn't need to brag about
their achievements. Gast has been all over the map as a USAID
official—from Kosovo, Colombia, Iraq, to Afghanistan.
Putman, described as a "Foreign Service Whistleblower," was honored in
2010 by the Foreign Service Association with the William R. Rivkin
award for dissent for challenging "the entire structure of AFRICOM,
[….] when she called them out on the way they were dealing with sexual
and gender-based violence victims."
(See: http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2010/06/25/foreign-service-whistle-blower-gets-an-award)
In any event, Makombo's litany of the alleged electoral malfeasance of
CENI in the 2011 general elections was craftily used by USAID
panelists to segue into more substantial points—such as the following
ones:
1) The decentralization (or devolution) conundrum: Provincial
"decoupage" (carving out) vs. revenues. A bone of contention between
the central government and provincial entities--many among whom are
not even being financially and fiscally viable to begin with—is the
retrocession of 40% of revenues from the central government to
provinces. With additional provinces to be carved out (the country
will have 26 provinces), how this problem will be solved is anybody's
guess.
2) Politicians and civil society groups seem to be facing a tough
choice: Reform CENI first then go to local elections; or instead go to
local elections first then reform CENI afterwards. The law reforming
CENI, though voted in Parliament, has still to be promulgated by
President Joseph Kabila. According to civil society members present,
the law is stuck over the objections from Catholic bishops who want to
see more members of civil society in the revamped CENI.
3) Self-criticism by civil society groups: their strengths and
weaknesses. There seem to be tough challenges in building a strong
network and coalition of civil society groups. There are "pocket NGOs"
and a proliferation of NGOs (more than 9,000 and still growing)
stampeding for dwindling funds from Western donors.
One civil society heavyweight present, Baudouin Hamuli, wanted to see
more resources go into training election experts.
Hamuli also claimed that Congolese civil society is alive and vibrant
despite its contradictions. According to him, civil society groups
have in fact wrested a vital space from the powers that be after 20
years of activism. He added that journalists' rights, especially the
freedom of expression, have dramatically been advanced by civil
society groups that include churches and women's organizations. He
acknowledged however that the coalition that would cement these groups
has to be strengthened.
***
PHOTO CREDITS: Courtesy USAID/DRC
opposition political activist; an unidentified civil society actor;
me; USAID/DRC Acting Mission Director Catherine Andang; USAID/DRC
Mission Director Diana Putman; USAID Deputy Administrator for Africa
Earl W. Gast; Chief of staff of USAID Africa Bureau Sean Maloney; and
Angèle Makombo-Eboum, opposition leader)
***
For his first visit to Kinshasa, Earl W. Gast, USAID Deputy
Administrator for Africa, found time in the early afternoon of
Wednesday, April 10, to talk with a select group of representatives of
civil society—as well as a high-profile politician—of the Democratic
Republic of Congo about a rare commodity in this country: governance.
Gast was flanked by his own chief of staff, Sean Maloney; USAID/DRC
Mission Director Diana Putman; Acting USAID/DRC Mission Director
Catherine Andang; USAID/DRC Democracy and Governance Officer Theodore
"Ted" Glenn; and two unidentified USAID/DRC staff members, who sat in
the background.
The high-profile Congolese politician I just alluded to was Ms. Angèle
N. Makombo-Eboum, chair of the tiny political party called "Ligue des
Congolais Démocrates" (LIDEC).
In my view, at a roundtable where "governance" is the theme, a good
governance of one's own narrative has to be the leitmotif too.
By introducing herself as one of the presidential candidates in the
November 2011 election when in fact she wasn't on the official roster
of the National Independent Electoral Commission (CENI), Makombo
failed miserably the test of what I'd call the "narrative's good
governance." At the end of the meeting, she gave me her business card
that read in parts: "Candidate at the presidential election of 2011 in
the DRC."
I don't understand why a leader of such national stature need to be
peddling such unnecessary untruths. No wonder then that Congolese
politicians have lost all political credit and are being looked down
with utter contempt by Residents of the Republic.
Well, two high-profile Americans in the room didn't need to brag about
their achievements. Gast has been all over the map as a USAID
official—from Kosovo, Colombia, Iraq, to Afghanistan.
Putman, described as a "Foreign Service Whistleblower," was honored in
2010 by the Foreign Service Association with the William R. Rivkin
award for dissent for challenging "the entire structure of AFRICOM,
[….] when she called them out on the way they were dealing with sexual
and gender-based violence victims."
(See: http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2010/06/25/foreign-service-whistle-blower-gets-an-award)
In any event, Makombo's litany of the alleged electoral malfeasance of
CENI in the 2011 general elections was craftily used by USAID
panelists to segue into more substantial points—such as the following
ones:
1) The decentralization (or devolution) conundrum: Provincial
"decoupage" (carving out) vs. revenues. A bone of contention between
the central government and provincial entities--many among whom are
not even being financially and fiscally viable to begin with—is the
retrocession of 40% of revenues from the central government to
provinces. With additional provinces to be carved out (the country
will have 26 provinces), how this problem will be solved is anybody's
guess.
2) Politicians and civil society groups seem to be facing a tough
choice: Reform CENI first then go to local elections; or instead go to
local elections first then reform CENI afterwards. The law reforming
CENI, though voted in Parliament, has still to be promulgated by
President Joseph Kabila. According to civil society members present,
the law is stuck over the objections from Catholic bishops who want to
see more members of civil society in the revamped CENI.
3) Self-criticism by civil society groups: their strengths and
weaknesses. There seem to be tough challenges in building a strong
network and coalition of civil society groups. There are "pocket NGOs"
and a proliferation of NGOs (more than 9,000 and still growing)
stampeding for dwindling funds from Western donors.
One civil society heavyweight present, Baudouin Hamuli, wanted to see
more resources go into training election experts.
Hamuli also claimed that Congolese civil society is alive and vibrant
despite its contradictions. According to him, civil society groups
have in fact wrested a vital space from the powers that be after 20
years of activism. He added that journalists' rights, especially the
freedom of expression, have dramatically been advanced by civil
society groups that include churches and women's organizations. He
acknowledged however that the coalition that would cement these groups
has to be strengthened.
***
PHOTO CREDITS: Courtesy USAID/DRC
Friday, 5 April 2013
Rwanda is reinforcing M23 for final assault on Goma
(PHOTO: Jules Hakizimwami, right, Speaker of the North-Kivu Provincial
Assembly, with Governor Julien Paluku)
***
Jules Hakizimwami, Speaker of the North-Kivu Provincial Assembly, held
a press briefing in Goma on Thursday, April 4, in which he was
hysterically denouncing Rwanda for sending personnel reinforcement to
M23 positions over the course of these last three days.
Strangely, as was noted by the Radio Okapi report on Hakizimwami's
press briefing, the timeline of the alleged M23 personnel infiltration
back into DRC territory overlaps with the announcement of the
relocation deeper inside Rwanda of 689 pro-Jean-Marie Runiga's M23
refugees made by Rwandan Minister of Disaster Management and Refugee
Affairs, Seraphine Mukantabana.
(See: http://alexengwete.blogspot.com/2013/04/m23-chief-bertrand-bisimwa-apocalypse.html?m=1)
Said Hakizimwami:
"The same troops that had gone into Rwanda are now being brought back
stealthily to reinforce those who are in Rutshuru. Very concordant
informations point to a concentration of men and weapons along the
Rumangabo-Kibumba corridor, precisely to assault the city of Goma."
(Source: http://radiookapi.net/actualite/2013/04/05/nord-kivu-le-president-de-lassemblee-provinciale-denonce-le-renforcement-des-troupes-du-m23/)
According to observers who've elaborated on the basis of Hakizimwami's
initial analysis, Rwanda--and Uganda, incidentally--wants M23 to
reoccupy Goma--and eventually attack Bukavu--ahead of the deployment
of MONUSCO's Intervention Brigade so as: (1) to preempt this
intervention by rendering the costs of its collateral damage
prohibitive in urban settings; and (2) to force the DRC government to
heed M23 "claims" (Hakizimwami).
Those who'd think Hakizimwami is somewhat paranoid ought to re-read my
post on "rules of accommodation (Congo) vs. Negotiating for side
effects (Rwanda)" (See:
http://alexengwete.blogspot.com/2012/06/rules-of-accommodation-congo-vs.html?m=1)
***
PHOTO CREDITS: Via provincenordkivu.org
Assembly, with Governor Julien Paluku)
***
Jules Hakizimwami, Speaker of the North-Kivu Provincial Assembly, held
a press briefing in Goma on Thursday, April 4, in which he was
hysterically denouncing Rwanda for sending personnel reinforcement to
M23 positions over the course of these last three days.
Strangely, as was noted by the Radio Okapi report on Hakizimwami's
press briefing, the timeline of the alleged M23 personnel infiltration
back into DRC territory overlaps with the announcement of the
relocation deeper inside Rwanda of 689 pro-Jean-Marie Runiga's M23
refugees made by Rwandan Minister of Disaster Management and Refugee
Affairs, Seraphine Mukantabana.
(See: http://alexengwete.blogspot.com/2013/04/m23-chief-bertrand-bisimwa-apocalypse.html?m=1)
Said Hakizimwami:
"The same troops that had gone into Rwanda are now being brought back
stealthily to reinforce those who are in Rutshuru. Very concordant
informations point to a concentration of men and weapons along the
Rumangabo-Kibumba corridor, precisely to assault the city of Goma."
(Source: http://radiookapi.net/actualite/2013/04/05/nord-kivu-le-president-de-lassemblee-provinciale-denonce-le-renforcement-des-troupes-du-m23/)
According to observers who've elaborated on the basis of Hakizimwami's
initial analysis, Rwanda--and Uganda, incidentally--wants M23 to
reoccupy Goma--and eventually attack Bukavu--ahead of the deployment
of MONUSCO's Intervention Brigade so as: (1) to preempt this
intervention by rendering the costs of its collateral damage
prohibitive in urban settings; and (2) to force the DRC government to
heed M23 "claims" (Hakizimwami).
Those who'd think Hakizimwami is somewhat paranoid ought to re-read my
post on "rules of accommodation (Congo) vs. Negotiating for side
effects (Rwanda)" (See:
http://alexengwete.blogspot.com/2012/06/rules-of-accommodation-congo-vs.html?m=1)
***
PHOTO CREDITS: Via provincenordkivu.org
Thursday, 4 April 2013
A specimen of the new breed of Ugly Americans: Howard G. Buffet
(PHOTO 1: Howard G. Buffet, billionaire philanthropist and
self-appointed stakeholder in the African Great Lakes Region)
(PHOTO 2: Erstwhile CIA operative and US State Department official
Hank Crumpton, CEO of the Crumpton Group and pen-for-hire of Howard G.
Buffet)
***
Writing yesterday in the Kigali-based daily New Times, reporter
Eugene Kwibuka celebrated--no doubt as a vindication of the Rwandan
government unconvincing denial of its involvement in setting up and
micromanaging the M23 bandits--the polished hogwash, written by
lobbyists on behalf of billionaire Howard G. Buffet and his
foundation, that purports to give a more informed view on the crisis
in eastern DRC than the one given last year by the UN Group of
Experts.
(Source: http://www.newtimes.co.rw/news/index.php?i=15316&a=65567)
The ridiculously laudatory piece by Kwibuka fails to point out that
this publication by the Howard G. Buffet Foundation (HGBF)--aptly
released on April's Fool Day--is a self-cannibalizing set of
plagiarisms lifted from a piece co-authored by Buffet and Tony Blair
titled "Stand with Rwanda: Now is no time to cut aid to Kigali"
published on Foreign Policy on February 21, 2013.
(I ranted on that nonsense here in a post of early March:
http://alexengwete.blogspot.com/2013/03/a-callous-buckraker-called-tony-blair.html?m=1)
Well, what else can one expect from a paper that has abandoned all
semblance of decent journalism to become the mouthpiece of the
repressive Kagame regime.
A more balanced assessment of the new dossier penned by Buffet's
mercenaries can be found on the blog ethuin.wordpress.com (With Eyes
Wide Open) in a post titled "Putting things in perspective: Buffet
Foundation versus UN Group of Experts"
(http://ethuin.wordpress.com/2013/04/02/putting-things-in-perspective-buffet-foundation-versus-un-group-of-experts/)
I won't be parsing the paid pro-Kagame informercial produced by Buffet
here, but I am rather marking it down as a benchmark: the dawn of a
new breed of Ugly Americans in the guise of roving global
self-appointed stakeholders.
These self-appointed stakeholders are even worse than the breed of the
new Africa scholars whose ambition, as I surmised in a post of June
2012, "is to make the traditional genre of Africa reporting extinct
and to replace it with something that is a cross between academic
hogwash and advocacy."
(See: http://alexengwete.blogspot.ca/2012/06/laura-seays-view-from-goma-in-warscapes.html?m=1)
What makes Buffet and his ilk dangerous is, firstly, the tons of
monies they're waddling in. Secondly, some of them, such as Tony
Blair, have been top political leaders who currently enjoy instant
access to the world top influential people and decision-makers. And,
lastly, as this most recent endeavor of Buffet has shown, they are
well connected to former spooks turned contractors running their own
intel outfits.
What's more, unlike "unselfish" advocacy groups such as the
International Crisis Group (ICG) or Human Rights Watch (HRW) that
often offer paths to lasting solutions in conflict situations or
advocate on behalf of individual citizens or civil society groups
often oppressed by the powers that be, these new "Ugly Americans"
brazenly advocate on behalf of repressive regimes and oppressive
leaders such as Kagame.
These new Western moneyed self-appointed global stakeholders have now
come to shore on the African continent to stake out their claims and
carve out cartographies of interventions--no matter how idiotic or
terrible they might be.
They're now busy attempting to change, orient, and trim the future of
the African continent to fit and suit their narrow interests while at
the same time driving out, evacuating, dispossessing, disempowering,
and disenfranchising legitimate local, indigenous stakeholders.
In sum, these self-appointed stakeholders--mostly American
unfortunately--are bad news for Africa. Therefore Buffet, being one of
them, is very bad news for Africa in general, and for the African
Great Lakes Region in particular. And I don't care how much money
Buffet is funneling to the good causes at the Bill & Melinda Gates
Foundation or the WWF.
No one knows what made Buffet appoint himself a stakeholder in and a
savior of the African Great Lakes Region.
But this past December, Buffet baffled Congolese and others in the
region when he "boosted" the Kampala M23-DRC government with a
whopping $500,000 donation!
Why would Buffet invest so much money in "boosting" a group so
universally hated by the Congolese?
You only get an answer to such questions circumstantially--by turning
for instance to one of the two hired guns Buffet enlisted to patch up
an incoherent attack against the UN Group of Experts laced with an
embarrassing panegyric of Kagame and a blasting attack against the
government of the DRC for its malgovernance.
I'm alluding here to the Crumpton Group, headed by erstwhile CIA
spymaster and US State Department official Henry "Hank" Crumpton.
In an interview last May with CNN Suzanne Kelly at the launch of his
memoir "The Art of Intelligence," Crumpton said:
"If you look at the role of non-state actors overall both as
adversaries as enemies, as allies as potential allies, as citizens,
and institutions that we need to protect, I think that they are
increasingly a part of the landscape."
(Source: http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/05/15/former-spys-memoir-gives-voice-to-the-frustration-that-comes-with-the-territory/)
Crumpton-qua-Buffet may therefore see M23 as part of eastern DRC
"landscape" for years to come and as actors to partner with in the
future balkanized Congo!
As I said before, in the ideal world of social and cartographic
engineering designs of these new self-appointed roving stakeholders,
local peoples and their imaginings don't exist. This ideal world has
no bearing whatsoever on the reality of Africa, having been hatched in
air-conditioned offices in Seattle, Washington, or in Arlington,
Virginia.
Postcolonial Africa has yet to start planning on ways of countering
the imperial forays of these colonists of the 21st century.
***
PHOTO CREDITS: PHOTO 1: Via farmfutures.com; PHOTO 2: Via cnn.com
self-appointed stakeholder in the African Great Lakes Region)
(PHOTO 2: Erstwhile CIA operative and US State Department official
Hank Crumpton, CEO of the Crumpton Group and pen-for-hire of Howard G.
Buffet)
***
Writing yesterday in the Kigali-based daily New Times, reporter
Eugene Kwibuka celebrated--no doubt as a vindication of the Rwandan
government unconvincing denial of its involvement in setting up and
micromanaging the M23 bandits--the polished hogwash, written by
lobbyists on behalf of billionaire Howard G. Buffet and his
foundation, that purports to give a more informed view on the crisis
in eastern DRC than the one given last year by the UN Group of
Experts.
(Source: http://www.newtimes.co.rw/news/index.php?i=15316&a=65567)
The ridiculously laudatory piece by Kwibuka fails to point out that
this publication by the Howard G. Buffet Foundation (HGBF)--aptly
released on April's Fool Day--is a self-cannibalizing set of
plagiarisms lifted from a piece co-authored by Buffet and Tony Blair
titled "Stand with Rwanda: Now is no time to cut aid to Kigali"
published on Foreign Policy on February 21, 2013.
(I ranted on that nonsense here in a post of early March:
http://alexengwete.blogspot.com/2013/03/a-callous-buckraker-called-tony-blair.html?m=1)
Well, what else can one expect from a paper that has abandoned all
semblance of decent journalism to become the mouthpiece of the
repressive Kagame regime.
A more balanced assessment of the new dossier penned by Buffet's
mercenaries can be found on the blog ethuin.wordpress.com (With Eyes
Wide Open) in a post titled "Putting things in perspective: Buffet
Foundation versus UN Group of Experts"
(http://ethuin.wordpress.com/2013/04/02/putting-things-in-perspective-buffet-foundation-versus-un-group-of-experts/)
I won't be parsing the paid pro-Kagame informercial produced by Buffet
here, but I am rather marking it down as a benchmark: the dawn of a
new breed of Ugly Americans in the guise of roving global
self-appointed stakeholders.
These self-appointed stakeholders are even worse than the breed of the
new Africa scholars whose ambition, as I surmised in a post of June
2012, "is to make the traditional genre of Africa reporting extinct
and to replace it with something that is a cross between academic
hogwash and advocacy."
(See: http://alexengwete.blogspot.ca/2012/06/laura-seays-view-from-goma-in-warscapes.html?m=1)
What makes Buffet and his ilk dangerous is, firstly, the tons of
monies they're waddling in. Secondly, some of them, such as Tony
Blair, have been top political leaders who currently enjoy instant
access to the world top influential people and decision-makers. And,
lastly, as this most recent endeavor of Buffet has shown, they are
well connected to former spooks turned contractors running their own
intel outfits.
What's more, unlike "unselfish" advocacy groups such as the
International Crisis Group (ICG) or Human Rights Watch (HRW) that
often offer paths to lasting solutions in conflict situations or
advocate on behalf of individual citizens or civil society groups
often oppressed by the powers that be, these new "Ugly Americans"
brazenly advocate on behalf of repressive regimes and oppressive
leaders such as Kagame.
These new Western moneyed self-appointed global stakeholders have now
come to shore on the African continent to stake out their claims and
carve out cartographies of interventions--no matter how idiotic or
terrible they might be.
They're now busy attempting to change, orient, and trim the future of
the African continent to fit and suit their narrow interests while at
the same time driving out, evacuating, dispossessing, disempowering,
and disenfranchising legitimate local, indigenous stakeholders.
In sum, these self-appointed stakeholders--mostly American
unfortunately--are bad news for Africa. Therefore Buffet, being one of
them, is very bad news for Africa in general, and for the African
Great Lakes Region in particular. And I don't care how much money
Buffet is funneling to the good causes at the Bill & Melinda Gates
Foundation or the WWF.
No one knows what made Buffet appoint himself a stakeholder in and a
savior of the African Great Lakes Region.
But this past December, Buffet baffled Congolese and others in the
region when he "boosted" the Kampala M23-DRC government with a
whopping $500,000 donation!
Why would Buffet invest so much money in "boosting" a group so
universally hated by the Congolese?
You only get an answer to such questions circumstantially--by turning
for instance to one of the two hired guns Buffet enlisted to patch up
an incoherent attack against the UN Group of Experts laced with an
embarrassing panegyric of Kagame and a blasting attack against the
government of the DRC for its malgovernance.
I'm alluding here to the Crumpton Group, headed by erstwhile CIA
spymaster and US State Department official Henry "Hank" Crumpton.
In an interview last May with CNN Suzanne Kelly at the launch of his
memoir "The Art of Intelligence," Crumpton said:
"If you look at the role of non-state actors overall both as
adversaries as enemies, as allies as potential allies, as citizens,
and institutions that we need to protect, I think that they are
increasingly a part of the landscape."
(Source: http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/05/15/former-spys-memoir-gives-voice-to-the-frustration-that-comes-with-the-territory/)
Crumpton-qua-Buffet may therefore see M23 as part of eastern DRC
"landscape" for years to come and as actors to partner with in the
future balkanized Congo!
As I said before, in the ideal world of social and cartographic
engineering designs of these new self-appointed roving stakeholders,
local peoples and their imaginings don't exist. This ideal world has
no bearing whatsoever on the reality of Africa, having been hatched in
air-conditioned offices in Seattle, Washington, or in Arlington,
Virginia.
Postcolonial Africa has yet to start planning on ways of countering
the imperial forays of these colonists of the 21st century.
***
PHOTO CREDITS: PHOTO 1: Via farmfutures.com; PHOTO 2: Via cnn.com
Tuesday, 2 April 2013
M23 chief Bertrand Bisimwa: Apocalypse Now
(PHOTO: Bertrand Bisimwa at a press briefing at Bunagana yesterday)
***
With the full deployment by the end of this month of the MONUSCO
Intervention Brigade, M23 political head Bertrand Bisimwa may most
definitely have started feeling the ground opening up under him and
his posse of international bandits.
In his reaction to the UN Security Council resolution 2098 (2013)
setting up an "Intervention Brigade" to go after M23 and other armed
groups, Bisimwa, who's recently taken on the habit of donning a stupid
oversized cow-boy felt hat à la Yoweri Museveni, said yesterday at a
press briefing at Bunagana that "from now on, peacekeeping forces will
wage war on groups of citizens who are demanding good governance in
our country."
Really, Bisimwa!
Could you show the world the petition signed by groups of Congolese
residents of the Republic asking you and your gangsters to kill,
plunder, and rape on their behalf for good governance?
Is Bisimwa waging war for "Groups of Citizens" or is he an element of
the hordes of "doppelgänger anticitizens" terrorizing peaceful
Congolese civilians?
(I systematically use on this blog the expression "doppelgänger
anticitizens"--coined by Comaroff and Comaroff in another context--to
tag individuals or groups evincing various kinds of uncivic
behaviors.)
Significantly, Bismwa added: "It [the UN military offensive campaign]
will be the Apocalypse!"
Apocalypse now, indeed, for Bisimwa, his bandits and his
sponsors--Rwanda and Uganda--as their loots in the Congo would dry up
overnight!
Congolese therefore can't wait to see the advent of this
Apocalypse--in the real or figurative sense--of Bisimwa and his M23
looters, rapists and mass murderers. In fact, most Congolese denizens
often even fantasize about real Apocalypse being visited upon Rwanda
and Uganda!
Well, it's never too late: Bisimwa and his fellow could still avoid
the Apocalypse by laying down their weapons and disbanding--with
individual members reporting to the nearest police precinct to detail
the mischiefs and atrocities they might committed upon Congolese
civilians. For this time around, civil society groups of the Kivus
have vowed to see to it that not one single abuser of human rights
would go unpunished!
Maybe Bisimwa and his international bandits didn't realize there was a
rising tsunami of outrage worldwide over military entrepreneurship of
cross-border resource pillages masquerading as homegrown legitimate
demands over governance--the very kind Rwanda and Uganda have been
repeatedly engaged in on the territory of the DRC, claiming staggering
human tolls and devastating humanitarian disasters.
Talking of humanitarian disasters, it now turns out that Rwanda is
having a tidbit of taste of the bitter medicine it had been
administering to the Congo over the years.
Rwanda Minister of Disaster Management and Refugee Affairs Seraphine
Mukantabana, who was describing yesterday to the Kigali daily "New
Times" the relocation of 689 M23 bandits (of the Jean-Marie Runiga's
faction) from the border district of Rubavu to Ngoma, also complained
about the lack of international assistance in this mini-refugee
crisis.
Said Mukantabana:
"The international community has ignored and adamantly decided not to
support us in managing this crisis. These are not our citizens,
neither are they our prisoners, they belong to the UN."
Adding:
"It is now upon the UN to provide other requirements for the refugees."
(Source: http://www.newtimes.co.rw/news/index.php?i=15315&a=65551)
This would sound like a cruel joke to the more than 800,000 Congolese
IDPs who've left their homes and livelihoods thanks to Rwandan-backed
M23 cross-border terror group.
And, if anything, this episode should serve as a cautionary tale to
Rwanda who's wont to cause mayhem, deaths, and mass displacement of
populations in the Congo.
***
PHOTO CREDITS: Via kigalitoday.com
***
With the full deployment by the end of this month of the MONUSCO
Intervention Brigade, M23 political head Bertrand Bisimwa may most
definitely have started feeling the ground opening up under him and
his posse of international bandits.
In his reaction to the UN Security Council resolution 2098 (2013)
setting up an "Intervention Brigade" to go after M23 and other armed
groups, Bisimwa, who's recently taken on the habit of donning a stupid
oversized cow-boy felt hat à la Yoweri Museveni, said yesterday at a
press briefing at Bunagana that "from now on, peacekeeping forces will
wage war on groups of citizens who are demanding good governance in
our country."
Really, Bisimwa!
Could you show the world the petition signed by groups of Congolese
residents of the Republic asking you and your gangsters to kill,
plunder, and rape on their behalf for good governance?
Is Bisimwa waging war for "Groups of Citizens" or is he an element of
the hordes of "doppelgänger anticitizens" terrorizing peaceful
Congolese civilians?
(I systematically use on this blog the expression "doppelgänger
anticitizens"--coined by Comaroff and Comaroff in another context--to
tag individuals or groups evincing various kinds of uncivic
behaviors.)
Significantly, Bismwa added: "It [the UN military offensive campaign]
will be the Apocalypse!"
Apocalypse now, indeed, for Bisimwa, his bandits and his
sponsors--Rwanda and Uganda--as their loots in the Congo would dry up
overnight!
Congolese therefore can't wait to see the advent of this
Apocalypse--in the real or figurative sense--of Bisimwa and his M23
looters, rapists and mass murderers. In fact, most Congolese denizens
often even fantasize about real Apocalypse being visited upon Rwanda
and Uganda!
Well, it's never too late: Bisimwa and his fellow could still avoid
the Apocalypse by laying down their weapons and disbanding--with
individual members reporting to the nearest police precinct to detail
the mischiefs and atrocities they might committed upon Congolese
civilians. For this time around, civil society groups of the Kivus
have vowed to see to it that not one single abuser of human rights
would go unpunished!
Maybe Bisimwa and his international bandits didn't realize there was a
rising tsunami of outrage worldwide over military entrepreneurship of
cross-border resource pillages masquerading as homegrown legitimate
demands over governance--the very kind Rwanda and Uganda have been
repeatedly engaged in on the territory of the DRC, claiming staggering
human tolls and devastating humanitarian disasters.
Talking of humanitarian disasters, it now turns out that Rwanda is
having a tidbit of taste of the bitter medicine it had been
administering to the Congo over the years.
Rwanda Minister of Disaster Management and Refugee Affairs Seraphine
Mukantabana, who was describing yesterday to the Kigali daily "New
Times" the relocation of 689 M23 bandits (of the Jean-Marie Runiga's
faction) from the border district of Rubavu to Ngoma, also complained
about the lack of international assistance in this mini-refugee
crisis.
Said Mukantabana:
"The international community has ignored and adamantly decided not to
support us in managing this crisis. These are not our citizens,
neither are they our prisoners, they belong to the UN."
Adding:
"It is now upon the UN to provide other requirements for the refugees."
(Source: http://www.newtimes.co.rw/news/index.php?i=15315&a=65551)
This would sound like a cruel joke to the more than 800,000 Congolese
IDPs who've left their homes and livelihoods thanks to Rwandan-backed
M23 cross-border terror group.
And, if anything, this episode should serve as a cautionary tale to
Rwanda who's wont to cause mayhem, deaths, and mass displacement of
populations in the Congo.
***
PHOTO CREDITS: Via kigalitoday.com